Liverpool’s late attempt to sign Chelsea right-back Malo Gusto on loan collapsed on Tuesday, September 1, after the clubs failed to reach agreement over the structure of the deal.
The approach came as Liverpool sought additional cover on the right side of their defence, with Conor Bradley facing injury problems and Jeremie Frimpong still adjusting to the demands of the position.
Liverpool’s Malo Gusto loan bid rejected by Chelsea
French journalist Fabrice Hawkins reported that Liverpool made a final push for Gusto before the 11pm transfer deadline, proposing a temporary move for the 23-year-old.
Gusto was considered an appealing option because of his Premier League experience, pace and attacking threat. His ability to operate in more than one defensive role would also have offered manager Andoni Iraola greater flexibility during a demanding campaign.
However, the two clubs held markedly different views on the terms. Liverpool wanted a straightforward loan, without an obligation to buy, while Chelsea were seeking a permanent transfer for the France international.
GOAL reported that Chelsea were unwilling to sanction a temporary departure unless it formed part of a longer-term commitment. Liverpool, having already invested heavily elsewhere during the summer, were not prepared to fund the permanent deal required by their Premier League rivals.
With neither side willing to compromise, negotiations ended without success and Gusto remained at Stamford Bridge.
The failed move underlines Liverpool’s concerns over their options at right-back. Bradley’s fitness has been a continuing issue, while Frimpong’s attacking qualities have not entirely removed questions over his defensive suitability in the role.
Gusto’s arrival would have provided immediate depth without requiring Liverpool to make another substantial long-term commitment. Chelsea, though, had little incentive to strengthen a direct domestic rival by loaning out an established young player without a clear route to a permanent sale.
Liverpool must now manage the position with their existing squad until at least the next transfer window. Any further setback for Bradley, or difficulties for Frimpong in a defensive role, could leave Iraola with fewer options than he had hoped for.
