Manchester City are expected to revisit their interest in Chelsea right-back Malo Gusto before the January transfer window, with negotiations potentially revived if the west London club lower their asking price.
Gusto’s position at Chelsea has become less certain under Xabi Alonso, with Reece James remaining a major option on the right and Marco Palestra providing further competition.
Manchester City may return for Malo Gusto in January
Reports indicate that Chelsea valued the 23-year-old at about £70 million during the summer, a figure Manchester City were unwilling to meet. Their demands are now understood to have softened, which could reopen discussions between the clubs.
City had previously hoped to structure a deal closer to £50m. Their interest is also strengthened by Gusto’s familiarity with Enzo Maresca, having worked closely with the Italian during his time at Stamford Bridge.
Gusto was reported to be open to reuniting with Maresca at the Etihad. The City manager has also previously praised the defender, saying: “Malo is doing fantastic.”
Maresca highlighted Gusto’s versatility as one of the reasons Chelsea’s system had worked effectively, with the Frenchman capable of operating out wide, moving inside or playing in midfield.
Chelsea face a difficult decision over Gusto
A sale could make financial sense for Chelsea. Gusto is contracted until 2030, leaving the club under no immediate pressure to sell, while a fee in the region of £60m to £70m would represent a significant profit.
However, transferring a young and versatile defender to a direct Premier League rival would carry sporting risks. Gusto is already proven in the division, and his ability to cover several positions is particularly valuable to a manager such as Maresca.
Chelsea’s increased depth could make his departure more manageable, but James’ injury history means selling Gusto would also remove one of the squad’s most dependable alternatives on the right.
Should Manchester City make a substantial offer, Chelsea may be willing to consider it. Any agreement, however, would be expected to reflect the value of strengthening a direct rival as well as the player’s long-term contract and versatility.
